tobyaw: (Default)
Toby Atkin-Wright ([personal profile] tobyaw) wrote2012-11-07 11:16 pm
Entry tags:

Books as objects

Many years ago, I thought that books were things to acquire, and never to dispose of. I bought books that I wanted to read, books that I thought I might like to read, and books I thought might be useful, and my library grew and grew. I read a lot, but bought more books that I could catch up with.

Then it slowly dawned on me that my interest in books should not be focused on the size of my library, but rather on the joy I had in reading books. And that joy was as much to do with the physical form of the book as with the contents of the book. I bought hardbacks because I liked the way that they felt in my hands and the way that they looked on my shelves. I learned to appreciate typography (initially fuelled by reading and rereading Knuth’s book on TeX), and grew dismissive of people who were willing to read mass-market paperbacks, with their poor design, shoddy bindings, nasty paper, and narrow margins.

I started to buy Folio Society books (some by subscription, and more from eBay); a lot of fiction (which I devoured) and non-fiction (which mostly sits of my shelves unread). I must stop buying non-fiction.

But then ebooks hit me, just a couple of years ago. I realised that I could buy books from Apple’s iBookstore (and occasionally from Amazon’s Kindle web site), and that I could read them quite happily on my iPhone screen (and latterly on my iPad).

Just as the old quote says that the best camera is the one that’s with you, the same applies to books. My iPhone is with me almost all the time, and my iPad is with me much of the time, so I always have books available to read, and it is now much easier to fill a quiet moment with a book than it ever was when I was reading hardbacks. Although I wish they could do more to improve the on-screen typography.

In the past couple of years I’ve gone from looking at my bookshelves as a rich resource of future pleasure, to seeing them as an archaic and dusty collection of dead trees. Apart from a few specific volumes, I no longer find the same thrill in the physical form of books.

I doubt I’ll buy many physical books in the future, except, perhaps, as presents, or to complete existing collections.

(By the way, it is clear to me that hardback fiction should be shelved without dust covers or slip cases, sorted alphabetically by author, and chronologically within each author, with the exception that specific series of books may be shelved together. Anything else would just be wrong.)

[identity profile] vivdunstan.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
The debate among book historians at the moment is largely about which areas ebooks and print books are most appropriate in, and some of the practical issues to do with their use. For example there are, as you say, a lot of issues involved with ebooks in libraries. DRM is an obvious one, which ties into question marks about longevity. Libraries have been caretakers of book knowledge for centuries, but it's unclear how well that will continue in the digital age. Even whether ebooks produced now can still be read in 10 years time, never mind much longer. Increasingly university libraries aren't investing in print books but are favouring ebooks instead, which can be a real struggle to read online (I'm thinking of the system Dundee University use here - yuck!) and will they still be available in a decade?

Fair point re the non fiction books, but I read masses of them. I worked through lots of O'Reilly's programming interview/essay books on my iPod touch, and still get some of their new books from time to time, such as a recently published one about sci fi lessons for user interface design, and another about steampunk and technology. Both are on my Kindle at the moment. Usually I have one main fiction book on the go, a number of short story collections at the same time, and several non fiction books. I'm a bit of a flighty thing when it comes to reading, and don't tend to stick to one thing. Also when I'm more brain tired the non fiction books tend to be easier to read than the fiction ones that can require more attention.