tobyaw: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] tobyaw at 11:44pm on 27/04/2010 under , ,

I’m looking forward to election day. Every general election, I host a party from 10pm — the time the polls close — to watch history unfold through the night as the results come in. As usual we’ll be watching the BBC all the way; familiarity with their correspondants and their ridiculous election graphics help to make up for the annoyances.

Kate is unimpressed by the thought of watching politics and politicians on TV so she'll be having an early-ish night, but I should be joined by Andrew, Emma, and Mary. And election-themed nibbles.

Does any one else fancy a night of politics in reasonably social company?

While watching the 2005 coverage, Beth, then a very small baby, put one finger around my glasses and pulled them apart. From that point onwards the evening was a blur.

location: KY16 8JY
tobyaw: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] tobyaw at 11:37am on 24/04/2010 under , ,
Not entirely surprised by this result.

Take the Who Should You Vote For? Scotland quiz

Conservative65
Liberal Democrat15
UK Independence7
Green-13
Scottish National Party-17
Labour-45

You expected: CON

Your recommendation: Conservative

Click here for more details about these results

location: KY16 8JY
tobyaw: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] tobyaw at 11:37am on 24/04/2010 under , ,
Not entirely surprised by this result.

Take the Who Should You Vote For? Scotland quiz

Conservative65
Liberal Democrat15
UK Independence7
Green-13
Scottish National Party-17
Labour-45

You expected: CON

Your recommendation: Conservative

Click here for more details about these results

location: KY16 8JY
tobyaw: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] tobyaw at 12:41pm on 17/04/2010 under
I didn't watch the leaders’ debate on TV the other night. I feel uneasy about the debates for several reasons:


  • Multi-way interviews are a poor-way to express policies and for the interviewer to challenge the interviewee. I think politics is better served by one-on-one interviews, like Paxman’s Panorama specials.

  • The format includes a mixture of English-only and UK-wide issues. It doesn’t feel good for Scotland, Wales and NI to be told that the next question doesn’t apply to them.

  • A UK general election is about choosing a local representative. Many candidates are from smaller parties, or independent, who are ill-served by the national media concentrating on Lib/Lab/Con party politics.



If the debate was intended to provide an expression of the policies of the parties who could be providing the next Prime Minister, I was dubious about the inclusion of the Liberals in the process. If on the other hand it is about expressing the politics of parties through their leaders, I can’t fathom why other parties with significant support across the UK (like the SNP, Plaid Cymru, and UKIP) weren’t. And pity poor NI where, of the national parties, only the Conservatives seem to be making an effort to engage directly in the political process.

However the impact of the debate has been larger than perhaps its television audience of under 10m would suggest. The first debate was very good for Clegg, and as a result, I think very good for British politics. It will be interesting to see whether the surge in Liberal support is sustained over the coming weeks.
location: KY16 8JY
tobyaw: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] tobyaw at 12:41pm on 17/04/2010 under
I didn't watch the leaders’ debate on TV the other night. I feel uneasy about the debates for several reasons:


  • Multi-way interviews are a poor-way to express policies and for the interviewer to challenge the interviewee. I think politics is better served by one-on-one interviews, like Paxman’s Panorama specials.

  • The format includes a mixture of English-only and UK-wide issues. It doesn’t feel good for Scotland, Wales and NI to be told that the next question doesn’t apply to them.

  • A UK general election is about choosing a local representative. Many candidates are from smaller parties, or independent, who are ill-served by the national media concentrating on Lib/Lab/Con party politics.



If the debate was intended to provide an expression of the policies of the parties who could be providing the next Prime Minister, I was dubious about the inclusion of the Liberals in the process. If on the other hand it is about expressing the politics of parties through their leaders, I can’t fathom why other parties with significant support across the UK (like the SNP, Plaid Cymru, and UKIP) weren’t. And pity poor NI where, of the national parties, only the Conservatives seem to be making an effort to engage directly in the political process.

However the impact of the debate has been larger than perhaps its television audience of under 10m would suggest. The first debate was very good for Clegg, and as a result, I think very good for British politics. It will be interesting to see whether the surge in Liberal support is sustained over the coming weeks.
location: KY16 8JY

Links

July

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
        1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9 10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31